Such Were Some of You

If you grasp for that comfort to which you are not entitled, you will forfeit the kingdom that you might have inherited.

God has granted a precious and unimaginably rich kingdom to those who come to him through Jesus Christ. But the way to him is narrow, and everything extraneous is too wide to fit through it. We must shed everything unrelated to the kingdom in order to enter the kingdom.

If we opt for the broad way to accommodate our earthly stuff, or try to squeeze through the narrow gate with a backpack full of earthly stuff, we won’t make it into the kingdom. Try to pull your hand, full of cookies, back out of a Mason jar. Or clutch a book and try to pull your arm through your shirt sleeve. You get the picture.

After all, it is Jesus who tells us to pluck out our eye, and cut off our hand, if such is necessary to enter the kingdom.

Don’t Talk with Your Mouth Open

Jealousy and strife are two of the “social sins” that Paul mentions in Galatians 5:19-21 — enmity (hostility), strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, and envy. These deeds of the flesh are in direct opposition to the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22-23). In fact, Paul says that the two are “against” each other (Gal 5:17).

This is relevant to the Corinthian church because they claimed to be “spiritual” people: believers who had progressed in wisdom and maturity such that they could challenge even Paul. He affirmed that they were believers, calling them “saints” and “brothers” and acknowledging that the testimony of Christ was confirmed in them due to the gospel coming in a “demonstration of the Spirit and of power.”

But Paul says that their claims are inherently contradictory. Something that they were doing was so contrary to the gospel, so contrary to the Spirit, so contrary to the cross of Christ, that he could not consider them “spiritual” in his instructions to them, but instead had to treat them as “fleshly” and “infants” in Christ. He says that they are being “merely human.”

3 Reasons to Pray with Other Believers

The church prayer meeting has fallen on hard times, for many churches going the way of sword drills and catechisms.

To paraphrase Tim Challies, more people say they want to be part of a praying church than actually commit to praying with the church.

There are many reasons for this, among which might be that prayer meetings aren’t very glamorous, refusing to accommodate themselves readily to an entertainment gospel. Imagine the anachronisms posed by juxtaposing biblical prayer with contemporary notions of church life, in the form of sermon titles:

  • “Four Easy Steps to Lamentation and Penitence”
  • “God Has a Wonderful Plan for Your Intercession”
  • “Three Personal Advantages to Forsaking Your Own Desires and Submitting to the Will of God”

6 Compelling Reasons for Christians to Join a Church

Membership in the local church is increasingly seen as optional for Christians. Some churches don’t practice membership at all.

There are two primary ideas associated with this idea of optional membership, both of which undermine  the local congregation. The first is the notion that a person’s spiritual health is not dependent on gathering with other believers. In this view, someone can be Christian without attending corporate worship or Bible study regularly with the same group of believers, or without attending at all. The second is the idea that even if a believer is attending in some fashion, he need not be formally joined to that congregation through membership. In other words, she doesn’t need to be on a list of “members” to satisfy the communal aspects of her faith.

How to Smoke Out a Calvinist

I had heard for several years that among the various Directors of Missions for local Southern Baptist Associations there were some who took it upon themselves to weed out “Calvinists”, keeping them from consideration for pulpit supply or for open ministerial positions.

I had also heard that consultants from state Baptist conventions help train pastor search committees to avoid hiring “Calvinists.” One Director of Missions suggested to me that because of what school I attended (The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary), I should include on my resume my understanding of the “Five Points of Calvinism.”

Smoking out the Calvinists

Apparently some Tennessee Baptists have taken up the cause of culling Calvinists in organized fashion, creating written guidelines and conducting training sessions. Tom Ascol, of Founders Ministries, has written about it here. In his article Ascol reprints the documents supposedly used to root out hidden Calvinist preachers (documents are entitled “Reformed Red Flags,” “Theological Differences Between Traditional Southern Baptists and Extreme Calvinists,” and “Belief Statement and Pastor’s Pledge”). These documents are obviously full of stereotypes, simplistic assessments, and mischaracterizations of Calvinism, Reformed doctrine, and the Doctrines of Grace.

Does everything have to be so “biblical”?

Many people who identify themselves as Christ-followers claim to believe the Bible is God’s revelation of himself to us, and, in the words of a famous confession, is the only sure guide as to what God would have us believe about him and what duty he requires of us.

Yet one author has pointed out that the claimed authority of Scripture is much different than the ‘functional authority of the Bible,’ that is, whether Scripture actually governs faith and practice in the life of the church.

Judging by what people say, there is not much functional authority goin’ on out there. Some of the most revealing statements come from church leaders, such as deacons. I collect anecdotes of the things leaders say, and for a long time the winner (loser?) in this area was the following:

I Don’t Want to Disagree with the Scriptures, but…[I will, anyway]

The deacons at a church were discussing the formation of a search committee for pastor, and worldly standards of education and prominence had been governing who the deacons suggested for the committee. One deacon then stood and read the various passages of Scripture teaching that the body is made up of various parts, each one fulfilling a specific role, and suggested that the deacons look to the spiritual qualifications and giftedness of its members to determine who should comprise the search committee. There was no discussion, but another deacon stood and began his defense of the former, traditional option with, “I don’t want to disagree with the Scriptures, but…”

That example has been relegated to position number two by the following:

Does Everything Have to be so Biblical?

The pastor had expressed his objection to the proposed Christmas program, which was more It’s a Wonderful Life than Advent, and a deacon, obviously growing tired of the preacher’s explanations, said “Biblical, biblical, biblical. Does everything this church does have to be so biblical?”

Well, one would hope so…

Neighborhoods more Neighborly than Church?

In my hopefully-soon-to-be-former profession [I was formerly a lawyer], I frequently encounter people upset about restrictive covenants.

Restrictive covenants are sets of agreements that homeowners in a particular subdivision or neighborhood abide by as a condition of owning a home there. Most of the restrictions are fairly simple, mostly common sense, and in south Alabama consist mainly of 1) promising not to put your car on blocks in the front yard, and 2) limiting yourself to 3 chickens, 2 goats or some combination thereof but not exceeding a total of 4 non-pet livestock (I can say this – in jest – because I have, at one time or another: had a car on blocks (in the back yard), raised chickens and rabbits, and grown a row garden complete with scarecrows, all only a few blocks from downtown).

People get very exercised about restrictive covenants, whether their apoplexy manifests in bristling at being told they must put white lights on a leafless tree at Christmas, or bristling that their neighbor two streets over did not put white lights on such a tree. We spend inordinate amounts of time and emotional energy stressing about whether the homeowner’s association – charged with enforcing the restrictive covenants – may, in fact, tell one of the members that his choice of landscape plants makes his house resemble a sunflower farm, and whether it should incorporate and purchase liability insurance to protect the ones unfortunate enough to tell a neighbor that his live-in RV, parked on the back patio and hooked in to the neighborhood sewer system, must go.

By significant contrast, it is virtually impossible in most congregations of Christian churches for members to become exercised about anything. Well, almost. But the things over which most congregations get exercised don’t quite seem righteous: someone sat in the wrong pew; preacher drives the wrong make of car; moderator has an “agenda”; teacher doesn’t use the right curriculum; pool hall across the street wants a liquor license.

The Bible has its own set of “restrictive covenants” for those who are truly neighbors, not merely in the geographical sense, but in the spiritual sense; those who have covenanted with each other to live kingdom lives under mutual submission to each other and to God through Christ. These covenants don’t tell us how many pets we can have, how many cars we can drive, or what sorts of decorations are approved. They do tell us that we are part of one another: rebuke one another, exhort one another, encourage one another, reprove one another. And we are not expected act a certain way so that our property values will remain high, but so that the witness of Christ will remain pure, the glory of God remain unblemished, so that we may “present every man complete in Christ” (Colossians 1:28-29).

If we were as concerned to present ourselves a living sacrifice, acceptable to God, as we are to ensure our hedges are trimmed, sidewalks are edged, and appraisals are high, we might see dramatic changes in the proclamation of the word we claim, in the sanctification of the neighbors we love, and in the glorification of the God we serve.